Those of you who are reading this and those who
sit next to you in the pew on Sunday morning would probably cringe a
bit at Humphrey’s "greedy geezers." Most would be appalled at his
advocating physician assisted suicide and euthanasia for the elderly
as a means of "cost containment." The idea of killing people "for
their own good" or granting the "right to kill" to those in the
medical profession with or without the "explicit request" of the
patient seems radical and contrary to moral reasoning. But such
ideas have quiet beginnings and stem from seeds we are not even
aware are being planted.
Even though most cringe at the elderly being
referred to as "greedy geezers," not all Christians are ready to
fully embrace the elderly as "people with purpose" either. Elderly
who are up and around are one thing, but the frail elderly, those in
nursing homes, those unaware of their surroundings, and those
suffering from debilitating disease, do they really have purpose?
It’s easy to talk piously about how the lives of the frail elderly
should be valued, but when it’s our husband or our mom or our
grandpa things can be different. They tell us they don’t want to be
a "burden." We don’t want to see them in pain or suffering. We don’t
want to see them helpless and have a seemingly meaningless existence
and we say things like, "Grandma would never want to be like this."
We love them, but care-giving can exhaust us. And, yes, financial
concerns creep into our thoughts and we feel guilty because of them.
End of life concerns for the majority of people
we know do not revolve around debates about the societal or economic
or moral implications of assisted suicide and euthanasia. They
revolve around what to do about grandma. And that is precisely the
place where the seeds scattered by the "right to die" movement seek
fertile ground. "Isn’t it compassionate to want to relieve grandma’s
suffering?" "Even if she pulls through this, what kind of quality of
life would she have?" "She wouldn’t want to live like this." The
whole thing germinates in a culture where we have been taught for
thirty-three years through abortion on demand that death is an
acceptable solution to the problems of life. Then we mix in a little
theology. "Certainly she would be better off in heaven." "What’s so
wrong with sending her to be with Jesus?"
We do not intend to, and there is certainly no
malice in our thinking, but we could end up treating grandma more
like a "greedy geezer" than a "person with purpose." We could fall
prey to the subtleties of a culture of death rather than praying to
the Lord of Life with the Psalmist. "Even [though grandma is] old
and gray, do not abandon [her], O God. Let [her] live to tell . . .
what your strength has accomplished."
This is not a prayer to let grandma live no
matter what and using every possible medical technology. This is not
a prayer to let grandma live using extraordinary means that only
prolong her dying. This is a prayer for God’s presence with grandma
as she nears life’s end. This is a prayer that acknowledges grandma
as a person with a purpose as long as God grants her life. This is a
prayer that acknowledges God’s love as revealed through the cross
and resurrection of Jesus Christ. This is a prayer that acknowledges
God’s strength and what He is able to accomplish in and through
grandma regardless of her condition or awareness.
People like grandma can "tell" a lot about God
and His strength because it is His power that is at work. In fact,
the less we are able to do, the more the power of God in Christ can
be seen at work in us. (See 2 Corinthians 12:7b-9.)
So, what do we do with grandma? We love her and
care for her. We treat her as a person with purpose. For we trust
that as long as God gives her life, then God’s power and purpose is
at work in her. When grandma’s body begins to die, when treatments
are doing more harm than good, then those treatments may be
withdrawn or such treatments need not be started. But we must never
withdraw anything or give anything with the intent of killing
grandma, even in the name of compassion and the relief of suffering.
Some will say that this line between allowing to
die and killing is not always easy to discern. This is true. In such
situations, the Christian consults with others, gets good medical
advice, and prayerfully makes the decision. The child of God in
Christ can be confident of God’s grace and mercy to be at work in
that decision and need not be burdened with guilt.
However, the majority of the time the line
between allowing to die and killing is quite clear. In such
situations, the decision is between trusting and honoring God as the
Lord of Life and giving in to a culture that looks for rescue from
problems in the god of death. At such times, the line is drawn
between taking the easy way and trusting in the way of the cross of
Christ which tells us how God’s great love is at work most
powerfully in the midst of suffering and uncertainty. At such times
the line is drawn between contributing to a culture that sees death
as its savior and changing the culture by witnessing to a living and
present Savior who has conquered death and brings meaning and
purpose to life.
It is the decisions that Christians make in
hospital and nursing home rooms that reflect their faith in a living
Savior that will help keep the seeds of the "right to die" movement
from spreading further and ultimately make a difference in our
society. It is Christians exercising their faith that will help
others see the difference between "greedy geezers" and "people with
purpose."